03.
PRESSURE ROADMAPS
PRESSURE ROADMAP: PEOPLE
PRESSURE ROADMAP: ORGANIZATIONS
HOW TO READ PRESSURE ROADMAPS
These are two maps — one for individuals and one for organizations. They show which forms of “pressure” and structural shifts recur most frequently across trend reports, and when, according to the sources, these changes are expected to materialize.

The data were aggregated according to the following principle: for each combination of stakeholder × time horizon × topic, we calculated the number of claims, identified the dominant direction of change, and generated a short summary based on the content of the clustered statements.

The visualization is structured as a temporal unfolding. Five columns represent time horizons, ranging from the immediate future (0–1 year) to the long term (10+ years). Within each column, the top five most significant themes for the respective stakeholder group are displayed.

Topic cards are color-coded by direction of change (red for increase, yellow for shift, green for emergence, etc.). The size of the indicator reflects the number of claims within that topic cluster, while the colored bar on the left identifies the stakeholder subgroup. Interactivity allows switching between an “All” mode (where all subgroups are visible simultaneously with color markers) and a focused view on a specific group. Hovering over a card reveals a short summary describing the dominant pattern of change.

The primary analytical value of the method lies in its ability to reveal temporal waves of transformation and concentrations of pressure. When multiple cards cluster within the same time horizon, this signals a potential period of heightened adaptation. Limitations include dependence on the completeness of the underlying corpus (the maps reflect only the claims present in the reports), the loss of nuance inherent in aggregation, and a degree of subjectivity in the generation of summaries.
Previous visualization
CONSENSUS VS CONTENTION MAP
A map of agreement and disagreement across sources. It shows which themes most reports converge on — and where assessments diverge, and how sharply.
Next visualization
TREND RADAR
A map of “signals of the future.” Each point represents a distinct claim about what lies ahead. Its position reflects the theme of the claim and its time horizon, while the color indicates the source’s level of confidence.
Made on
Tilda